Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle, 89-7225 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 89-7225 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 18, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 902 F.2d 962 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 304 , 284 U.S.App.D.C. 136 Janice BYRD, Appellant, v. Cassandra A. PYLE, Executrix, et al. No. 89-7225. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. April 25, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 18, 1990. Prior report: D.C.C., 728 F. Supp. 1 . Before EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 Upon consideration of appellant's motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is 2
More

902 F.2d 962

53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 304, 284 U.S.App.D.C. 136

Janice BYRD, Appellant,
v.
Cassandra A. PYLE, Executrix, et al.

No. 89-7225.

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

April 25, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 18, 1990.

Prior report: D.C.C., 728 F. Supp. 1.

Before EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of appellant's motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S. Ct. 104, 106, 95 L. Ed. 36 (1950).

3

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer